INITIOVATION. MANIFESTO

Chapter 1 — Definition of Initiovation and Its Conceptual Framework

2.1. What Is Initiovation?

Initiovation is a new discipline formed by the intersection of three domains that precede innovation itself: cognitive preparation, behavior architecture, and system design.

Short definition:

Initiovation is a scientific discipline of preparation that accepts innovation as a process that is not random, but designable and teachable.

Extended definition:

A measurable and repeatable methodology that approaches the mental processes, behavioral patterns, and operational systems from which innovation emerges through the principles of engineering.

Because it is the first approach to unite these three domains under a single framework, Initiovation is not just a method; it is a paradigm shift.

2.2. A Three-Component Structure

Initiovation is the intersection of three components:

  1. Consciousness Engineering

Aims to optimize mental variables such as:

The scientific foundations of this area are:

  1. Behavior Architecture

The design of systematic processes that determine an individual’s output, such as:

Behavioral science tells us this:

What determines output is not motivation, but repeated behavior.

For this reason, in Initiovation behavior is not a free variable; it is an intentionally designed architecture.

  1. System Design

Refers to organizing, from an engineering perspective, the layers of the structure in which an individual or institution exists, such as:

The simpler, more transparent, and more measurable a system is, the more naturally innovation emerges as a result.

2.3. Why Is Initiovation a New Concept?

Because Initiovation does not treat innovation as the result; it treats innovation as something that must be prepared for.

Until now, the innovation literature has mainly focused on:

However, the cognitive preparation and behavioral training that create the conditions in which innovation arises have not been addressed in a systematic way.

Initiovation fills this gap.

Innovation → is the output.
Initiovation → is the engineering of that output.

2.4. The Difference Between Innovation and Initiovation

Innovation Initiovation
The result. What comes before the process.
A product, idea, or solution. The architecture of consciousness, behavior, and system.
Can be random. Repeatable and learnable.
Focuses on success. Focuses on preparation.
Measures impact. Develops capacity before impact.

It is not accurate to say, “Without innovation there can be no Initiovation.” The more accurate statement is:

If Initiovation exists, innovation is no longer a possibility; it is a high probability.

2.5. The Scientific Principles of Initiovation

This discipline is built on five fundamental scientific principles:

  1. Measurability
  1. Repeatability
  1. Simplicity (Clarity)
  1. Feedback Loop
  1. Intention → Behavior → System → Impact

These principles ensure that the discipline is constructed entirely within a scientific framework, without resorting to any esoteric or metaphysical elements.

2.6. What Does Initiovation Aim to Do?

Its aim can be expressed in a single sentence:

To align innovation capacity with the cognitive capacity of the human being.

More explicitly, we ask:

We model the answers to these questions scientifically, and then apply these models to the innovation process.

The result: the capacity of a person or an institution to generate innovation increases permanently.

2.7. Core Characteristics of Initiovation as a Discipline

At this point, Initiovation opens a new door for humanity.

References Used in This Chapter

[1]

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

[2]

Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 87-114.

[3]

Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81-97.

[4]

Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25-42.

[5]

Baumeister, R. F., & Tierney, J. (2011). Willpower: Rediscovering the Greatest Human Strength. Penguin Books.

[6]

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper & Row.

[7]

Newport, C. (2016). Deep Work: Rules for Focused Success in a Distracted World. Grand Central Publishing.

[8]

Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 19-23.

[9]

Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), 829-839.

View Full Bibliography (56 sources) →
← Back to Manifesto contents